Author: jollymonsails

Intellectual Property Attorney, Geek, Pro Bono Publico voluntario
Uncategorized

“Require the Opinion” : On a divided, limited, checked, and balanced executive- NOT a unitary executive

jollymonsails

Limited Executive NOT a King:

If only there was some way to determine what the founders intended and the social contract we started with the Magna Carta through the Constitution and Amendments have established. Perhaps we can infer from the fact, firstly (1): that Congress was defined BEFORE the president in Article I. A King, of supreme importance would be established first, no? (Article II contra Article I).

(2) Secondly, if the President is to be a King, a unitary executive, why did the framers not allow him to even choose his own Vice President? Instead, the framers explicitly established an adversarial Vice President in the Executive branch with no provisions for the President to unilaterally fire or replace the Vice President? (See Article II, section I original text before Amendment 12 circa 1804, et seq.)

(3) Thirdly, if the President is to be a unitary executive, a king, why is his oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution” – and not the Presidency? (Article II, Section 1) – moreover, why must he “faithfully execute the laws” which are established by Congress? (Article II, Section 3).

(4) How can anyone suggest the president has plenary power over all the other Officers of the executive (whose oaths are also to the Constitution and NOT the president) if the president cannot even appoint his own “executive” Officers without Congressional “advice and consent” / confirmation?

(5) Even with senate confirmation of his Officers, the president’s only expressly defined Constitutional power with respect to those officers is that he may “require the Opinion, in writing,” of exclusively the “principal Officer” of the executive departments and only on subjects relevant to their duties. He has no power to require the written opinion of subordinates; his power only extends to the Congressionally-confirmed principal Officer. The president isn’t empowered to define the Opinion, modify the Opinion, apply pressure to the principal officer, demand his presence and verbal report, etc. (Article II, Section 2).

Considering longstanding cannons of statutory and constitutional construction, such as: expressio unius est exclusio alterius (by stating something you exclude the alternatives not mentioned) – AND the Constitution expressly: (1) providing for impeachment (not executive whim or pleasure) as the sole mechanism to remove Officers of the executive; (2) providing for Congressional supervision of executive Officer commissioning; (3) providing for democratic election of the Vice President with no input from the President or ability to remove/replace; and (4) establishing all officers to have loyalty solely to the Constitution and not the President – where does this unilateral power to fire any and all executive officers (without the Constitutionally prescribed impeachment) come from?

Still further, considering the Avoidance of Absurdities and No Surplusage or No Superfluous words cannons (that every word in the Constitution should be given effect and absurd results avoided): why would the Constitution expressly grant the president only the right to “require the opinion” of the heads of departments when he, arguendo, already has been granted plenary power over all executive officers? Wouldn’t this power to require reports then be surplusage and absurd? The entire universe of plenary, absolute power over all executive officers AND he can require a report? Silliness.

It wasn’t until 1926 in the Meyers case that the Supreme Court established this unilateral removal power of the president – couched on the mandate and duty that the president “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Quite a stretch in my opinion – that a clause limiting the president and subordinating him to the laws of the Congress has been distorted to grant the president unitary executive powers.

Make your mind up yourself – below is the text of the original Constitution (including the text before the 12th Amendment with salient portions in bold). The Constitution ONLY gives the president the power to “require the opinion” of those executive officers not to terrorize them into compliance with his whims.

Article II

Section. 1.

…

In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.

…

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Section. 2.

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Section. 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Uncategorized

Proposed Constitutional Amendment to Avoid Corruption and Appearance of Impropriety – and To Restore Trust

jollymonsails

NOTE: MARKUP BOLD TEXT ADDED and DOUBLE BRACKET [[…]] REMOVES:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America of, by, and for We the People.

ARTICLE I.

Section 9

…

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them (*to be crystal clear, this is to be construed broadly to include the President (official presidential library staff, campaign staff, corporations, trusts, advisors, employees, family members, strawmen, etc., mutatis mutandis) and ALL other Officers (including those temporarily or permanently assigned with or without Senate confirmation) of/by/for the United States, the Congress, administrative agencies, and of the Courts including the Supreme Court Justices), no Officer shall, without the explicit Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, bribe, tip, reward, contribution, non-bona fide court settlement, etc., (broadly construed to include anything of nontrivial value such as, e.g., luxury airplanes, bags of money, recreational vehicles, gold, diamonds, real estate, intellectual property, contracts, etc. – but not sentimental, artistic, symbols having no significant monetary value from nonprofits, children, or other leaders or peacemakers symbolizing teamwork, unity, friendship, etc.,), Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, corporation, artificial, constructive, or real person, or foreign State, group of states, nongovernmental entity etc.(to be construed broadly). Any such present, bribe, tip, reward, emolument, of any kind whatsoever shall be immediately held by the Supreme Court strictly in trust (with full transparency and accounting – and receiving no benefit or interest therefrom) solely for the public welfare- and shall revert to the Congress to be used for social security programs, healthcare, or public works to benefit children, seniors, homeless, etc. if not ratified by a unanimous vote from both houses of Congress within 2 days.

Article. II.

Section. 1

…

The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a just and fair Compensation, irrevocable security, travel, reasonable home, and vacations which shall neither be encreased [[nor diminished ]] during the Period for which he shall have been elected nor diminished during his life, and to maintain independence, avoid corruption and the loss of public trust in the government by manifest appearance of impropriety, he shall not receive within that Period any other tip, reward, contract, donation, contribution such as, e.g., a luxury airplane, recreational vehicle, gold, diamond ‘art’, bag of money, fishing, island, or golfing holidays, travel, real estate, bribe, bad faith court settlement, or Emolument (construed broadly to include anything of value to the president and/or any strawman such as, e.g., the President’s Official Library, campaign, family, attorney, trust, corporation, … or other such strawman, mutatis mutandis) from the United States, or any of them.

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office and each year at his state of the union address, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States – and not willfully, recklessly, or negligently take any actions or inactions which would conflict with the Constitution and the spirit thereof of limited executive, divided powers, federalism, checks, and balances and respect for the rule of law – including that no man shall serve as his own judge.”

Section. 2.

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States as laid out under Article I above – and such service shall be solely and exclusively abroad and outside the United States – however, the President may never, himself, call into such actual Service within the United States, itself, for domestic law enforcement against citizens of the United States, any of them, the Congress, administrative agencies, or the Courts under a broad Posse Comitatus, separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism approach; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the solely and exclusively executive Departments except for the Department of Justice, itself, to thereby maintain political independence of the Attorney General and the director of the FBI – and any independent administrative agencies established by Congress and ratified by a President, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices – but, to establish independence, avoid corruption, or appearance of impropriety and maintain separation of powers, limited executive, and checks and balances, he shall not have the power to command or unduly influence an outcome, decision, access or modify underlying data, studies, legal opinions, or attorney work-product, remove or reassign said officer, diminish or increase such officer’s pay or imprison or deport said officer or his family or any other such action meant to unduly influence the independence of such officer, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment – or of cases where: (1) he himself incited or gave aid and comfort to domestic political violence, coup, riot, or insurrection; (2) where the president attempts to pardon himself or his family, attorney, accountant, subordinate, trustee, or insurrector; or (3) child rapists and their conspirators.

…

Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery (this is to be construed broadly to include e.g., rewards, tips, travel, luxury airplanes, money in a paper bags, gold, recreational vehicles, real estate, contracts, bogus sham non-bonafide court settlements, etc.) or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.  We the People, directly reserve a non-exclusive right to impeach and convict a president, vice president, and all civil Officers of the United States upon petition of 30% of registered voters and conviction by 60% thereof.

…

Article. III.

Section. 1.

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour but not more than 20 years – and NO rewards, tips, gratis, honorariums, bribes, donations, paid fishing, island, or golf getaways, luxury travel, recreational vehicles, school fees for children or grandchildren (to be construed broadly) shall be allowed – as corruption of the Court and the mere appearance of impropriety should be avoided at all costs to restore the public faith in the Judiciary, the Rule of Law, fair, equitable, and blind administration of Justice, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a just and fair Compensation including irrevocable security detail, security clearance, a home, travel, and reasonable vacations, which shall not be diminished during their [[Continuance in Office]] life unless impeached.

The supreme Court Judges, having reached 20 years of service – shall form an independent Justice and Ethics committee with binding authority to order Judges to show cause as to why they should not be recused or removed for bad behavior including unethical conduct or conflict of interest to avoid appearance of impropriety.  Until such time as a quorum of 3 Judges shall have retired from active service – having reached their 20 year term, the committee may be composed of retired federal judges nominated by the Chief Justice and confirmed by a majority of the supreme Court Judges – such appointees shall receive all protections and benefits of Judges of the Supreme Court and the responsibilities therewith.  The Chief Justice and such Justice and Ethics committee shall act in good faith and with all due haste to effect the spirit of this section and to eliminate corruption from (and remedy distrust of) the Court.  Said Justice and Ethics committee shall strive to be transparent and prompt in publishing ethics opinions – and dissents shall they arise.

…

Article. VI.

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, [[and]] the Members of the several State Legislatures, any legal or constructive entities formed or established, and all executive and judicial Officers (including e.g., the President and supreme Court Judges respectively), both of the United States and of the several States (mutatis mutandis), shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

…

First Amendment

We The People, uniquely, having a sense of morality, conscience, duty, affinity, justice, liberty, and ethics and also fear, pain, hunger, mortality – whereas, in opposition, merely legal or constructive entities such as, e.g., for-profit corporations do not and instead merely maximize shareholder value or some other aligned goal – thus, to protect people and promote those people being able to positively affect government and to preserve their rights: 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech for real people, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.  Care must be taken to protect bona fide free speech – (even that which may be unpleasant) but distinguishing between speech towards forming a more perfect union or good society on one hand – and disruptive foreign or artificial speech for the speaker’s own profit towards sowing disunity, war, and hatred (especially of the little guy) on the other as an end into itself.  Hate speech and trolling may be profitable – but we cannot build a society where hate-speech is incentivized and profits flow to false prophets.

…

14th Amendment

Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. The United States, nor any of them, no State, no Court, no Judge, Justice, Court, nor any Officer such as the President shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws nor remove any person to avoid or loophole around this Section and avoid jurisdiction of the Courts.

Section 2

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any (any, any) office (ALL OFFICES), civil or military, under the United States (TO BE CRYSTAL CLEAR- THIS INCLUDES THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT), or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States (ANY OFFICER, INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT), or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection, promoted public unlawful violence, terrorism, coup, treason, conspiracy, or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.  In the absence thereof, the Courts, Justices, Judges, Officers, and We the People, all having taken the oath and pledge of allegiance to this Constitution, in accordance with Article VI, shall enforce the provisions of this Constitution as the agreed upon Supreme Law of the Land.

Uncategorized

Farewell White Island?: White Island “Restoration”* Plan

jollymonsails

We live by White Island in beautiful Escambia County on Pensacola Bay in the very toe of the boot of Florida (about 3 hours east of New Orleans) – Pensacola, the First City, the First Settlement in the New World, The Cradle of Naval Aviation, the Sailing Capitol of the World – Sailtown, USA – The home of the Blue Angels and American Magic – and sandy white beaches, White island, and emerald waters.

Unfortunately, ALL the public access, sandy beaches and waterline on Pensacola Bay have been bought up, turned into mansions, yacht clubs, country clubs, condos, and lined with rocks and piers – no safe areas for Kayakers, SUP, or small boats to land in an emergency. White Island is the last soft, sandy beach and island(s) in Pensacola Bay. But it may be destroyed any day! 😦

Construction has begun. Thousands of white plastic pvc poles demarcating the planned destruction and rock walls have been placed all around the island. Today may be her last day. Everything in black check pattern below is to be surrounded with turbidity curtains, chains, and dredged, killing everything that lives there, sullying the water, churning up decade old poisons, pollution, and toxins, huge barges and construction, then heaping all the dead dredged sand right on the animals that might still be alive on the two islands spared from the initial destruction.

When / IF a “restored” White Island emerges – after “425” Days (provided there’s no delays) and the dust settles, they’ll have created a literal moat and wall around the island, rock barriers, submerged reefs, invasive marsh blackneedle plants, and two kill-corridors of blind, rock lined, narrow fast boat access paths and eight new islands completely covered in marsh with no sandy beach or access… instead only a “managed recreational access” on the southernmost island.

White Island has always been a safe, natural, clean area for small unpowered boats, SUPS, kayaks, sailing dinghies, kids, and schools of tiny fish escaping the bigger fish, walking in the shallows with your family or sitting on the sandy beach, sheltered under the trees, in a hammock, or wading, swimming safe from fast boats with huge wakes or the bullsharks. This is precisely because it’s so shallow that the fast boats with big wakes avoid the northern side of White Island (by Davenport Bayou outlined in blue below) and it’s too shallow for sharks to sneak up on you. Over the decades thousands of families have camped out and welcomed the Blue Angels home as the island is right by the flightline on a winds from the west day – or watching American Magic foiling by. Now, this is to be made illegal. 😦

  On the Southern side of White Island (by the Navy Channel to Bayou Grande shown in Red) There’s a nice wide channel (rocky on only one side) with sandy grade that small kayaks, sups, windsurfers, sailing dinghies from the Navy Morale, Welfare, Recreation MWR marina and surrounding community can escape a big, fast boat with wake coming through that channel.

(Red rock lined Navy channel and Blue New “Recreational Boat access”)

I’m very concerned that this White Island Restoration Plan calls for significantly narrowing both the north and south of White Island ingress/egress, creating a new “recreational boat access” (Blue) by dredging the northern area which will bring in fast boats, and adding rocks to create a bottleneck with blind turns with views obstructed by the rocks and new islands and creating a kill corridor lined with rocks on both sides of the southern Navy channel – leaving the small unpowered boats, sups, windsurf, sailing dinghies that may have to tack against the wind to navigate a very tight channel surrounded on both sides by rocks and currents with fast boats flying through. Many children enjoy this area and this seems needlessly dangerous. Literally placing the kids between waves and reefs, rocks, and fast boats 😦

Dredging and creating this new boat access (shown in blue ) will only invite fast boats into this area, the only safe place away from fast boats for kids and families.  If the goal is to reduce erosion, preserve water quality, and provide for recreation – this blue path, if it absolutely must be dredged, should be a No Wake Zone – to prevent wake-based erosion and keep it safe for dolphins, children, families, and small unpowered craft.  The fast, powered, big boats are able to use the red Navy channel to access White Island. No need for them to come up by the children and small unpowered craft in such a narrow, blind, rock-lined corridor.

There is no reason that the southern deep Navy channel (shown in red above and below) can’t be the sole recreational access for fast big powered boats, while preserving the blue area for small unpowered, sail, paddle, dinghy, SUP, kayak type craft, for swimmers, pets, and people walking amongst the islands. The concern is that the Navy channel will now be a narrow corridor lined with rocks on both sides (as seen above and below in red) and small unpowered/human/solar powered boats, sups, kayaks, windsurfers, sailing dinghies which may have to tack in this area to fight the current and wind now have no safe harbor or passage in and out of the bay and Bayou Davenport (Primary Kayak/SUP launch at Civitan Park) without great risk.

(Rocks to be on both sides of significantly narrowed Navy Channel to Bayou Grande – rockpiles and breakwaters on the right).

(New Northern “recreational boat access” lined by rocks, submerged reefs, marshes, blind corners, obstructed by new islands and marsh grass).

              As a community, we feel misled. This was to protect recreation, stop erosion, and preserve the cleanliness of the water… but this new northern recreational boat access route with the dredging and being surrounded by rocks and reefs will make this significantly less safe for families and impede recreation.  Now, we are finding out that the whole of North White island will be surrounded in invasive weeds, entirely blocking off the beach access. If a child has a boat failure or starts taking on water, or, god forbid, is hit by one of these fast boats coming in the new recreational motorboat access to the north, there will be no sandy, soft, safe beach for the child to swim to to avoid drowning or a sinking kayak.

(Northern White Island to be entirely surrounded by rocks, reefs, and marsh in yellow – removing all sandy beach access even on leeward side).

              The beauty of White Island is being able to walk safely in crystal clear, shallow water, with white sand, for miles. But dredging between the islands now makes it deep, dark, and invites fast boats and sharks and precludes the ability for children to walk safely between the islands without fear of drowning or encountering fast boats, big wakes, or bullsharks. It seems, we can no longer camp out or bbq – now outlawed IN fLoRiDa!!!? – and that ONLY a “managed recreational access” will be provided? While the figures show a sandy beach on all the islands, it seems that an invasive marsh will be formed so people not only can’t walk between them, they can’t even walk or sit or land on them, even on the leeward sides as the marsh extends into the water and is known to be an invasive species known to grow out of control and clog drainage and kayak/sup access?

              Our main concerns, in order, are (1) safety, (2) preservation of the cleanliness, nature, native species of the area, and (3) preserved free recreational access with soft landing spots in case of emergency. Please reconsider your support, and politely contact your representatives to reconsider or slightly modify the current plan of creating the new Davenport Northern recreational boat access (Blue above) and wholly blocking off the Northern White Island leeward side. Please ask them to also consider extending a No Wake Zone to preserve the safety, beauty, and small boat, family activities along the northern Davenport Bayou North White Island area.

This is the last of the sandy beaches and islands in Pensacola Bay safe for waders, swimmers, small sailing, human, or electric non-emission, no wake, exercise recreational activity. To kill everything in the kill zone, surround it in rocks, open up a superhighway dredged for big, fast boaters destroys the last of these safe nurseries, cradles of Naval sailing, SUP, Yakking in Pensacola Bay – the Sailing Capitol of the US and cradle of Naval Aviation / Sailing.

There just doesn’t seem to be a need for fast motored recreational boat access on both sides of White island. Recreational, powered, fast boats could use the Red, Southern Navy Channel, while preserving the Blue Northern Davenport area for unpowered, clean electric powered, human powered, swimmers, waders, kayaks, small SUP or sailing dinghy ingress and egress safely which also reduces erosion, promotes safety and recreational opportunities.

Consider a small rental sailing hobiecat or sunfish with US Navy / Airforce dependent children and families trying to tack a small boat without motor or oars UPwind / against the current through the Navy Channel to get to Pensacola Bay (Or coming home after a sail to Gulf Breeze or Maritime Park- while avoiding poles, markers, rocks, fast boats bidirectional traffic, wakes, waves, dolphins… This is about to become very dangerous. Especially with the new “!!!KEEP 500 feet away signs!!!” deployed at Magazine Point last week.

It is about to be spring break 2025 with Navy MWR marina sailboat, hobiecat, kayak, SUP, Sunfish rentals – those young servicemembers and their families and visiting friends trying to navigate upwind against the current out and trapped in the narrow rock-lined Navy Channel— are going to be severely at risk if they put up chains and turbidity curtains with all the thousands of PVC poles further restricting the width of the channel.

Even worse, from a safety perspective, for Navy sailors is that the roughly 3 miles of soft, safe sandy shore to land in an emergency on the sail to and from Fort Pickens will now be entirely blocked off by rocks, reefs, marshy islands with only tiny turbulent ingress/egress routes which will be impossible to navigate safely – especially with waves, wakes, squals, inevitable aging and equipment failures of sailboat / SUP / sunfish / hobie components, motors, sails, etc. If the White Island Restoration Living Shorelines project proceeds as-is it will put sailors, servicemembers, and their families, dependents, and children – as well as the broader community- at risk.

Uncategorized

A Reasonable Construction of the Constitution Avoiding Absurdities and Loopholes

jollymonsails

Franklin Bryan

Franklin Bryan

The Constitution was written in the 1700s — about 300 years before Google Docs, online collaboration, github revision checking, find and replace, copy and pasta. The very last lines of the Constitution of Article VII expressly acknowledge and evince the sloppy nature of the drafting pointing out interlineations, erasures, modifications. If you look at the actual parchment, there are erasures and interlineations as acknowledged in Art. VII. This was a working document, made hastily against their remit to amend the Articles of Confederation, they hastily redrafted a Constitution. There are internal inconsistencies everywhere.

There are inconsistent uses and internal inconsistencies everywhere, especially with reference to Officer, Office, Officeholder, Executive Officer, Civil Officer, holding an Office of “Profit or Trust” (Article I, Section 9, emphasis mine throughout) or “Trust or Profit” (Article II, Section 1) or “Office or Public Trust” (Article VI). See below:

As we see above quite clearly and as plainly acknowledged in Article VII, the Constitution is a mess. Office “of Profit or Trust”; Office “of Trust or Profit; “Office or public Trust”…. What we know for sure is that they weren’t creating loopholes, they were trying to limit the president to not have a king. They were trying to separate powers horizontally and vertically through legislative, executive, judicial and between the states and federal government. They were trying to create checks and balances. And, knowing that the Constitution was to be ratified BY WE THE PEOPLE who couldn’t all read very well, it was written without flourishes to be plainly evident, short, succinct.

They even acknowledged the powers of the People — from which power flows with the consent of the governed, then their representative Legislature FIRST, BEFORE the mere president.

Now, if they believed in a limited executive officer with separation of powers, federal separation of powers, lateral separation of powers, national sovereignty for the benefit of the People, not a king or emperor,… we must consider some absurdities that arise from president trump’s lawyer’s arguments in front of the Supreme Court of Colorado in Anderson vs. Griswold 23sa3000.

Firstly, in salient part, trump has argued that he is “Not an Officer of the United States” with no duty to “support” the Constitution; and secondly that “an insurrection” is not an “insurrection” as prohibited in the 14th Amendment, Section 3.

The huge problem with this argument is that if the president is NOT an “Officer” then nothing prohibits the president from collapsing the separation of powers amongst states and fed, amongst the branches, consolidating it in himself and forfeiting our national sovereignty. Nothing prohibits the president from soliciting bribes, titles of nobility, or positions in foreign governments. Nothing prohibits the president from serving as his own elector, judge, and jury — and most importantly, even if impeached, nothing compels him to leave office? Not to mention that Congress could require he not be Muslim, Mormon, Jew, or Christian?

See for example Article I, section 2 and 3 where only “officers” are prohibited from serving in either house of Congress — and no requirements for the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore to even be members of Congress. An unscrupulous non-officer president with the help of a subordinate senate or house could appoint himself Speaker of the House and President Pro Temp, could solicit a state to appoint him as their representative and/or senator (according to the varying state Constitution powers to fill vacancies)?

The President could further appoint himself as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court… and, in that capacity, would preside over his own impeachment trial, and vote wearing his hat as Senator. If the president is impeached, would he remain as President Pro Temp, Speaker of the House, elector, and Chief Justice unless he was convicted in multiple impeachments for each position?

As a Representative or Senator or Speaker or President pro temp, could he have absolute Freedom of Speech and immunity under debate clause on the floor to incite insurrections again?

In fact, ALL limitations on the president are only effective if he is an “officer.”

Is it Consistent with your understanding of prudence, temperance, public policy, and our Constitution, that president Biden could freely, openly, notoriously solicit and accept bribes (“emoluments”) from ccp red china or russia or iran, saudi? Could Biden or trump concurrently serve as putin’s prince of the russian federation? If not, what stops them?

The other side makes big import that the president is not “appointed” and therefore can’t be an officer because he didn’t appoint himself… and he is tasked with appointing all officers. But the Constitution clearly spells this out as appointing “all other officers.” If George Washington grew hemp and other plants… one clearly understands hemp is a plant. If the president appoints “other officers,” clearly he himself is an officer.

If a President is NOT an Officer, then they aren’t forbidden from coups or insurrections? There is no enforcement mechanism to protect our Constitution.

If a President isn’t an Officer, then it’s not a crime or insurrection under the insurrection act to threaten or assasinate the President?

The very first US Code, 1 USC, Section 1, Congress defined an “Officer” without any pushback from any of the previous 44 presidents or the Supreme Court as “ANY person authorized by law to perform the duties of the office.”

Clearly then, the most reasonable construction of the Constitution is that the president is an “Officer” — is limited; that there are separation of powers; that there are checks and balances; that presidents are NOT above the law. That Jews, Mormons, Catholics, Christians or Muslims can’t be forbidden from the Presidency. The President can’t install himself in the House and/or Senate and/or Supreme Court with a simple majority. The President can’t serve as his own elector, judge, and jury — or pardoner. Simply follow Article VI mandate that “all executive officers” “shall be bound” to “support” the Constitution and the extra duties in Article II oath further clarify that duty to support — including faithfully executing the Constitution (“laws”), preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 may be oft ignored and hard to find, but is dispositive: The Constitution vests its powers only in “Officers” of the United States. If one is not an Officer, then they have no power. Clause 18 doesn’t say it vests any power in a president… only “Officers” of the United States.

Similarly, if they aren’t obliged by oath (or affirmation) to “support” the Constitution under Article VI, then they aren’t an “executive Officer.” This would be absurd.

Now to turn to trump’s other arguments that “an insurrection” isn’t an “insurrection” …

qed.